Monday, March 21, 2011

The Elizabethan Audience

suberabundant energy
soaring imagination
puffed with pride
reckless daredevil
sensuous and sensual
furious in hate and love
avid of swift sensation
primitive savagery of manners
violently passionate
frankly brutal

Just to recap, my focus is love and this week I'm comparing sonnet 18 with the play Romeo and Juliet. But first, I wanted to research Shakespeare's audience to hopefully shed some light on what was going through Shakespeare's head when he wrote on the topics of love. Alfred Harbage wrote an essay called "Shakespeare's Audience: Modern Appraisals" and in it he quotes Brander Matthews who uses the red phrases above to describe Elizabethan audiences. When I read this I thought, "I didn't realize Elizabethans were such intense, obnoxious people." However, Harbage goes on to explain:
Were Shakespeare's contemporaries truly such galvanic creatures? . . . Nothing we can discover from examining their daily routine, their frugal expense accounts, and their quiet and sensible letters suggests that Elizabethans, individually or collectively, were vastly different from us. . . We ourselves live in a spectacular age, without being individually spectacular.

I think it's useful to know that Shakespeare's audience was a lot like we are today. So why did the Elizabethans and why do we today thrive on such dramatic, extreme entertainment, especially when it comes to love and romance? I made a post about this at the very beginning of the semester and I compared and contrasted sonnet 18 to the modern trends in movies and literature. Check it out if you're wanting more on this topic.

In my next post I'm planning on comparing the text of sonnet 18 to the text of romeo and Juliet and drawing some conclusions about what Shakespeare really thinks of love and the idea of love at first sight. But I think knowing these things above about his audience for the plays will help in drawing those conclusions.

Comments (8)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I think this is so interesting! It''s really intriguing to compare Elizabethan culture to ours. I'm not sure if I agree that there are NO spectacular individuals in our age of spectacle-- maybe that isn't what you were claiming (Lady GaGa comes to mind)-- but I would be interested to hear more of your argument definitely! Good inquiry :)
1 reply · active 732 weeks ago
Thank you! And yes, it could be that we have a few spectacular people in our day. But I think someone like Lady GaGa is spectacular on stage, but maybe not so much in her every day life. She has to do many of the mundane tasks we do. But then again, Lady GaGa and I don't hang out, so I could be wrong.
I agree that it is really important to know the audience when it comes to Shakespeare. We do know he was at least partially motivated by money, so he would have to make some concessions for his audience.

For some reason, when I read that quote in your post, it makes me think of the difference between a BYU student at a basketball game versus that same student studying in the library. When we're surrounded by spectacle, we tend to buy into it more.
1 reply · active 732 weeks ago
That is a very good comparison! It's true, a sporting event can encourage a whole lot of spectacle. I probably should've given some modern day examples in my post. Thank for the idea.
It doesn't matter what time or place we look at people, we're all human beings, and though cultures, trends, etc. differ from place to place and time to time, there are a lot of basic things that we have in common.
1 reply · active 730 weeks ago
Hannah, I really like the set-up of your blogs and posts. You have used the suggestion well of highlighting points you want to stand out. Audience likes these kinds of things.
Thank you so much! Since you've made this comment I've tried to keep it up.

Post a new comment

Comments by